Facebook Messenger VS Messenger Lite: Which Is The One For You?

With over 1.3 billion monthly active users, Facebook Messenger is at par with WhatsApp, which passed the same figure in July 2017. The original Messenger app comes loaded with several advanced features such as support for GIFs, animations, over-sized emojis, Stories, and etc.

Moreover, it includes feature-rich Instant Games and bot stores. 

messenger_cover

All these features make up a heavier Messenger app that gets sluggish at times. Fortunately, there is an alternative called Messenger Lite. Facebook's very own Lite version of the messenger app is getting popular on app stores

Lite has been available for a while in India and Africa and was recently launched in four additional countries. It's a stripped down version of the Messenger that sports the basic features only.

Let’s take a look at a few major differences between Facebook Messenger and Messenger Lite.

1. Storage and Memory Consumption

Facebook's original messenger app multiplies in size and consumes more storage over a period of time. The Messenger takes up total 199MB data, out of which the app size itself is 139MB while the user data is 59.72MB.

On the other hand, Messenger Lite takes up a total space of just over 25MB, out of which the app size is 20.20MB and the user data is over 3MB.

fb-memory1
Fb-memory

The average memory usage is around 187MB for the Facebook Messenger while the Messenger Lite uses just 46MB of memory.

Quick Fact: Messenger Lite doesn't pre-load received photos unless you manually tap on them. Till then, the received photos are seen in a low-res thumbnail.

2. UI and Overall Design

One of the main difference between the two apps is the user interface (UI). The Messenger app looks cramped up with several action buttons.

The navigation bar at the bottom comprises buttons for Home, Contacts, Camera, Games, and BotsMessages, Active, Groups, and Calls buttons are at the top along with the search bar and the Me bubble for the user profile. This makes the whole chatting experience unintuitive.

fb-home1
fb-home

Messenger Lite, however, ditches almost all of these extra features and focuses on three simple buttons at the top for Home, Contacts, and Profile. You can simply swipe right or left to toggle among them.

The exclusion of the navigation bar allows Lite to offer more room leading to easier navigation. One of the best things about Messenger Lite is its ability to provide its user with a seamless conversation in fewer taps.

The real issue with the Messenger app is the overdose of a bunch of features that are hardly ever used.

3. Features and Capabilities

With Messenger Lite, you can send and receive messages, images, voice notes, and stickers and make/receive audio calls using Wi-Fi. One thing you cannot do with Lite is make or receive video calls and it's okay, if you ask me, as you already have dozens of apps for video calls.

fb-chat
fb-chat1

However, one area where Messenger Lite falls short is security. Facebook Messenger offers end-to-end encryption with Secret Conversations

fb-encryption
fb-noencryption

Also, since the whole idea behind Lite is to save data, it doesn't feature animations in stickers, GIFs, and location sharing.

Messenger Lite does away with a lot of data-hogging features and focuses on the basic task of messaging.

A Clear Winner

It's as clear as it can be. Messenger Lite uses much less memory and is designed to function on 2G networks and in areas with poor or limited Internet connectivity. 

Lite is not targeted only for users, who want to save data or storage on their phone, as it lets you do basic chatting seamlessly and still manages to offer decent features such as emojis.

So, are you thinking of switching to Messenger Lite, if you aren't hooked on it already? 

Let us know what other messenger apps do you use in comments? We'd love to know.

Sneha Bokil

By

See more posts by this author.

Show CommentsHide Comments